JoshuaWise.com

Solid State Tesla Coil, mk.II


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
projects:sstc2 [2012/01/10 09:25]
joshuawise [Build log]
projects:sstc2 [2012/04/30 06:38]
joshuawise [Solid State Tesla Coil, mk.II]
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 On this page, I describe the basic design, and provide some level of added detail for the implementation. On this page, I describe the basic design, and provide some level of added detail for the implementation.
 +
 +===== Quick Links =====
 +
 +If you're looking for something specific, try one of these links:
 +  * [[projects:sstc2:pfc|Power Factor Correction circuit details]]
 +  * [[http://nyus.joshuawise.com/coil/|Interim photos]]
 +  * ...
 +
  
 ===== System design ===== ===== System design =====
Line 14: Line 22:
  
 ==== Input stage: PFC ==== ==== Input stage: PFC ====
-{{ http://nyus.joshuawise.com/pfc-test-jig.scale.jpg?350|}}+{{ http://nyus.joshuawise.com/coil/pfc-test-jig.scale.jpg?350|}}
 We chose a power factor correction boost circuit as a basic design for our input stage.  The PFC circuit provides a few advantages: We chose a power factor correction boost circuit as a basic design for our input stage.  The PFC circuit provides a few advantages:
   * **Higher rail voltage.**  In the US, rectifying 120V mains will result in only 170V on the rails.  SSTCs tend to perform better given higher voltage; the PFC design that we've chosen gives 350V on the rails (limited only by the expense of the switching components that we chose).   * **Higher rail voltage.**  In the US, rectifying 120V mains will result in only 170V on the rails.  SSTCs tend to perform better given higher voltage; the PFC design that we've chosen gives 350V on the rails (limited only by the expense of the switching components that we chose).